
26th Annual Meeting and Symposium of the
Desert Tortoise Council, March 16-18, 2001 Abstracts

"Planning" to Save the Tortoise in the California Desert
Michael J. Connor
Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee, 4067 Mission Inn
Ave., Riverside, California 92501

Management of Gopherus agassizii in the California desert has
been a major component of Federal planning efforts since long before the
tortoise's emergency listing under the Endangered Species Act in 1989.
The 1976 Federal Land Policy and Management Act established the 25
million acre California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA), directed the
Bureau of Land Management to develop a plan to manage it, and marked the
start of a 25 year planning odyssey by the Bureau that continues today.
In 1994, the USFWS published a Recovery Plan for the Desert Tortoise
(Mojave Population) that laid out a series of recommended actions to
achieve the long-term goal of delisting of the tortoise through
recovery. The nonprofit Desert Tortoise Council, Desert Tortoise
Preserve Committee, and California Turtle and Tortoise Club are
committed to ensuring that the Recovery Plan is implemented in the
California deserts, and to this effect designated the author to
represent them in the bioregional planning efforts that are underway.
This presentation will evaluate the ongoing tortoise planning efforts
for adherence to Recovery Plan recommendations.
| Management Plan/Action |
Onset1 |
Approval2 |
| CDCA Plan |
March 1977 |
December 1980 |
| Desert Tortoise Natural Area |
November 1986 |
December 1988 |
| State listing |
August 1987 |
June 1989 |
| Federal listing |
September 1984 |
August 1989 |
| Rand Mountains Fremont Valley |
August 1988 |
February 1994 |
| Critical Habitat Designation |
January 1993 |
February 1994 |
| Desert Tortoise (Mojave Population) Recovery Plan |
September 1990 |
June 1994 |
| West Mojave Plan |
March 1991 |
|
| NECO |
March 1993 |
|
| NEMO |
July 1995 |
|
1Date of establishment of a Technical Review Team or first public scoping.
2Date of publication, signing or Record of Decision. |
Preparation of tortoise specific management plans has been a slow
process. A management plan on the Desert Tortoise Natural Area was
signed in 1988. This plan was drafted for the BLM by the Desert Tortoise
Preserve Committee and, while adequate at the time, predated the listing
of the tortoise and is now in need of substantial revision. The 1994
Rand Mountains Fremont Valley Management Area plan included 88
management actions the vast majority of which have never been
implemented. This plan also predates the publication of the Recovery
Plan and needs to be updated.
The three bioregional planning efforts that are expected to carry
tortoise recovery in California have yet to bear fruit. The West Mojave
Plan has been over 10 years in the making but recent Congressional
action related to the proposed expansion of Fort Irwin has added new
purpose and urgency. A draft of the NECO plan was released February 26,
2001 after an 8-year effort. The National Park Service component of the
NEMO plan has been released in the draft General Management Plan for
Mojave National Preserve, and a draft of the BLM component is expected
by summer. Each of these plans claims to be scientifically driven and
compatible with the Recovery Plan. However, political considerations
have assured that none aspire to fully implement the Recovery Plan's
recommendations but tend instead to enshrine current management practice
within a DWMA framework. Continuing declines in tortoise numbers
documented at the permanent study plots throughout the region and
increasing calls from biologists for its listing under the Federal
Endangered Species Act to be upgraded from threatened to endangered
belie the compatibility of current management with tortoise recovery.
|