
Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting and Symposium of the
Desert Tortoise Council, March 5-8, 1999
Abstracts

Facilitation and Interference Between Annuals and Shrubs
in the Mojave Desert
Claus Holzapfel1 and Bruce E. Mahall2
1Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003;
2Department of Ecology,
Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa
Barbara, CA 93106

Coexisting species are likely to have both negative and positive
effects on each other, and the resultant of both types of interactions
may contribute to long-term interspecific dynamics and species
coexistence. Using the close association of annual plants with
a desert shrub (Ambrosia dumosa) in the northern Mojave Desert
of California as a test system, we identified and quantified negative
and positive effects of annuals on shrubs and shrubs on annuals.
A separation of negative and positive effects was achieved using
an experimental design which included reciprocal removals of neighbors
and simulations of physical effects of neighbors on water availability
using artificial structures. Assessments of performance of shrubs
and annuals showed that neighboring shrubs and annuals compete
for resources but also facilitate each other. Even though positive
and negative effects were acting simultaneously, the relative
importance of positive and negative effects shifted during the
growing season. Annual plants benefited from the presence of shrubs
to the largest extent early in the growing season, while the negative
effect of annuals on shrubs declined as senescence of the annuals
ensued later in the season. Positive and negative effects among
associated plant species are likely to vary among seasons. Therefore
the outcomes of interactions will change among years and neighbors
may be favored or depressed to varying extent in different years,
thereby influencing long-term coexistence. The investigation of
a shrub-annual association over four consecutive years showed
that bi-directional positive and negative effects between shrubs
and annuals varied strongly from year to year. Since these opposing
effects also varied independently among years, the magnitude of
resulting net effects changed in time as well.
Based on theoretical considerations it has been predicted that
positive net interactions (facilitation) will be more prominent
in years of low resource availability (e.g., low rainfall). Negative
net interactions (interference) are expected to be of greater
importance in years with high resource availability. Such a predicted
trend was not found for the effects of shrubs on annuals. Shrubs
facilitated annuals to the largest extent in intermediate years,
in extremely wet and dry years positive net effects were comparatively
smaller. The effect of annuals on shrubs followed the prediction
more closely; annuals interfered with shrubs increasingly from
dry to wet years. Overall however, annuals benefited from shrubs
most of the time and annuals always had negative effects on shrubs.
Annuals seem to act as "shrub parasites". It remains to be tested
whether this disproportion in the interaction is caused by recent
changes in the annual plant community due to invasion by non-native
plants. Today, non-native plants contribute more than 3/4 of the
biomass within the investigated annual plant community. Long-term
changes in the interaction of shrubs with annuals need to be monitored
in order to assess possible changes in desert shrub communities.
|